PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Denies IPR Institutions Without Patent Owner Rebuttal Evidence

PTAB Denies IPR Institutions Without Patent Owner Rebuttal Evidence

by Joe Sauer | Nov 15, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Final Written Decisions, Trial Institution

By Stephanie Mishaga, Joseph Sauer, and Evan McLean – It is no secret that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) often leverages its discretionary denial powers to deny inter parties review (IPR) petitions.  The PTAB has discretionarily denied IPR petitions,...
Fed. Cir. Rejects PTAB Decision on Mystery Shopper Patent; Returns to Sender

Fed. Cir. Rejects PTAB Decision on Mystery Shopper Patent; Returns to Sender

by Carl Kukkonen | Nov 1, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Trial Institution

By Carl Kukkonen – The Federal Circuit in AMC Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Fall Line Patents (Fed. Circ. September 30, 2021, op. 21-1051) held that the PTAB partially abused its discretion when upholding one claim of U.S. Patent No. 9,454,748 for which the patent owner...
Some Conditions May Apply – Fintiv Factor 4 Analysis

Some Conditions May Apply – Fintiv Factor 4 Analysis

by Albert Liou | Oct 29, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Alison Ibendahl and Albert Liou – In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution of inter partes review after accepting the Petitioner Microsoft’s stipulation to forego overlapping challenges in parallel district court proceedings...
Sotera Stip Results in Institution Despite Co-Pending ITC Case

Sotera Stip Results in Institution Despite Co-Pending ITC Case

by Matthew Johnson | Jul 2, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Andrea Beathard and Matt Johnson – A Sotera-style stipulation has once again convinced the PTAB to not exercise its discretion to deny institution of inter partes review (“IPR”) under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).  In Ocado Group PLC v. AutoStore Technology AS,...
PTAB Declines to Exercise Discretion Post-Markman

PTAB Declines to Exercise Discretion Post-Markman

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 16, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – Petitioner (Apple, Inc.) filed a petition to institute inter partes on a patent owned by Koss Corporation (Patent Owner).  The PTAB considered six factors from Fintiv to assess whether to exercise authority to deny institution...
Awkwardly Divided Petitions Triggers § 314(a) Denials

Awkwardly Divided Petitions Triggers § 314(a) Denials

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 8, 2021 | Petitions, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel,* Marlee Hartenstein, and Matt Johnson In Fantasia Trading LLC v. Cognipower LLC, IPR2021-00070, Paper 21 (May 20, 2021), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declined to institute inter partes review (IPR) where Petitioner Fantasia Trading LLC...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.