by Matthew Johnson | Jun 7, 2023 | PTAB News
By Stephanie Mishaga, Emily Towers, and Matt Johnson – The USPTO issued an advance notice of proposed rules (“ANPRM”) on April 21, 2023 and is requesting comments and feedback from practitioners on proposed, proposed changes at the PTAB. The full ANPRM document...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 7, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB News
By Adam J. Cook,* Christian Roberts, and Matt Johnson – On May 12, 2023, the Intel v. VLSI chronicle continued as the PTAB issued a final written decision holding that all of the challenged claims of VLSI’s U.S. Patent No. 7,725,759 (“the ’759 patent”) were...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 2, 2023 | Motions Practice, PTAB News
By Levent Herguner, Derek Walker,* and Matt Johnson – On May 10, 2023, a PTAB Panel excused the late filings of the Patent Owner and allowed over thirty exhibits and a Corrected Patent Owner Response (“CPOR”) to be submitted into the record in Samsung...
by Matthew Johnson | May 30, 2023 | PTAB News
By Jack Graves and Matt Johnson – On May 16, 2023, the Federal Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the Board to vacate an institution decision based on stock ownership of an administrative patent judges (“APJ”) in In re Centripetal...
by Matthew Johnson | May 25, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently issued back-to-back Fintiv denials. The first denial issued on May 4, 2023. Read here about Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. California Institute of Tech., No. IPR2023-00130, Paper 10 (P.T.A.B. May 4, 2023). ...
by Matthew Johnson | May 18, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – The Board exercised discretion under § 314 to deny inter partes review in view of co-pending district court litigation. In the Institution Decision, the Board evaluated the Fintiv factors in light of the USPTO Director’s June...
