PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 29, 2022 | Joinder, Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – The PTAB denied a request for institution and joinder because the petitioner was the petitioner in one other instituted IPR directed to the same patent, and the petitioner did not explain adequately to the PTAB why another...
Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 1, 2022 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel and Matt Johnson – Patent Owner, IP Bridge, filed a patent infringement suit against Petitioner, Ericsson, for infringement of seven of its patents directed at radio communication between a base station and a mobile station and related apparatuses...
Single-Patent Sotera Stipulation Sufficient

Single-Patent Sotera Stipulation Sufficient

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 23, 2022 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Simon Maxell* and Matt Johnson – On March 3, 2021, Via Transportation, Inc. (Plaintiff/Patent Owner) filed an infringement suit against RideCo Inc. (Defendant/Petitioner) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas for infringement of U.S....
Door Closed On Petitioner Who Failed To Prove Analogous Art

Door Closed On Petitioner Who Failed To Prove Analogous Art

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 16, 2022 | Prior Art Issues, Trial Institution

By Matt Modderman,* Robby Breetz, and Matt Johnson – A PTAB panel recently denied IPR institution where one of the asserted prior art references was non-analogous and thus the POSITA would not have made the proposed § 103 combination.  The Chamberlain Group, LLC v....
PTAB ‘Guiding Principles’ Favor Supplementary Declaration in ‘Close’ Case

PTAB ‘Guiding Principles’ Favor Supplementary Declaration in ‘Close’ Case

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 10, 2022 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Emily Tait and Jack Graves* – A PTAB panel recently granted a Petitioner’s motion to submit a second expert declaration that directly addressed deficiencies identified by the PTAB’s Institution Decision. While a “close” case, the panel concluded that allowing the...
PTAB Institutes PGR, Denies Conditional IPR Petition

PTAB Institutes PGR, Denies Conditional IPR Petition

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 19, 2022 | PGR, Trial Institution

By Nicolas Aalberg,* Evan Jones, and Matt Johnson – On June 10, 2022, the PTAB in Apple Inc. v. MemoryWeb LLC denied Apple’s “conditional” IPR petition but instituted review of Apple’s concurrently-filed PGR petition, finding that MemoryWeb’s U.S. Patent No....
« Older Entries

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.