by David Cochran | Feb 19, 2020 | 325(d) issues, Trial Institution
By Dave Cochran – 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) gives the PTAB discretion to deny a petition for inter partes review when the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were previously before the Office – including during original examination, reexamination, or...
by David Maiorana | Feb 3, 2020 | Trial Institution
By Jasper Tran, Matthew Chung, Dave Maiorana, and Matt Johnson – On September 12, 2018, the PTAB in NHK Spring Co. v. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc. exercised its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny institution of an IPR, despite the petition’s timely filing,...
by Tim Heverin | Dec 2, 2019 | CBMs, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Trial Institution
By Morgan Restaino and Tim Heverin Following guidance from the Federal Circuit, the PTAB has vacated a previous Board decision granting Covered Business Method review in Apple, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC (P.T.A.B. Dec. 3, 2018). The PTAB’s decision to...
by David Maiorana | Nov 7, 2019 | Real Party in Interest, Trial Institution
By Robby Breetz and Dave Maiorana To institute an inter partes review (IPR), the petition requesting the proceeding must be filed within one year of the petitioner or real party in interest (RPI) receiving a complaint alleging patent infringement. 35 U.S.C. §...
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 28, 2019 | Trial Institution
By Tom Ritchie and Matt Johnson The status of a parallel district court proceeding may provide a basis for the PTAB to deny institution of an IPR pursuant to § 314(a). NHK Spring Co. v. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc., IPR2018-00752, Paper 8 (PTAB Sep. 12, 2018)...
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 16, 2019 | Trial Institution
By: Yury Kalish and Vishal Khatri – Since their inception as part of the AIA, inter partes reviews (IPRs) have been a favorite tool in the arsenal of patent challengers. Their statutorily mandated 18-month schedule oftentimes allows the PTAB to resolve a question of...
