PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Does Not Provide a Supplemental Discovery Venue

PTAB Does Not Provide a Supplemental Discovery Venue

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 10, 2022 | Discovery, PTAB News

By Nick Bagnolo and Matt Johnson – Following the grant of institution of a recent IPR petition in the matter of Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California, IPR2021-00662, Paper 26 (PTAB Feb. 11, 2022) concerning U.S. Patent No....
Discovery Request Seeking Deposition Preparation Materials Denied

Discovery Request Seeking Deposition Preparation Materials Denied

by Josh Nightingale | Jan 24, 2022 | Discovery, Motions Practice

By Christian Roberts and Josh Nightingale – The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently denied a Motion for Additional Discovery because the movant could not prove beyond mere speculation that the requested documents would be useful to show witness...
PTAB Denies Patent Owner’s Last-Minute Discovery Request

PTAB Denies Patent Owner’s Last-Minute Discovery Request

by Carl Kukkonen | Aug 16, 2021 | Discovery, Motions Practice, PTAB News, Real Party in Interest

By Carl Kukkonen – In Unified Patents, LLC f/k/a Unified Patents Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (IPR2021-00827), the PTAB denied a patent owner’s request to file a motion for additional discovery into any real...
In Your Dreams – Additional PTAB Discovery Remains Elusive

In Your Dreams – Additional PTAB Discovery Remains Elusive

by David Maiorana | May 11, 2021 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues

By Dave Maiorana and Bobby Karl – Discovery in an IPR proceeding is limited compared to district court litigation in order to focus the proceedings and promote speed and efficiency.  The PTAB Practice Guide and 37 C.F.R 42.51 provide for three types of...
Creative COVID-Time Deposition Procedure

Creative COVID-Time Deposition Procedure

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 23, 2021 | Discovery, PTAB News

By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – Depositions for proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are usually taken in the U.S.  See 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(b)(2), (b)(3).  Furthermore, many foreign jurisdictions have restrictions on taking depositions within...
A Compelling Decision – Board Addresses Scope Of Work Product Protection

A Compelling Decision – Board Addresses Scope Of Work Product Protection

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 24, 2020 | Discovery, Expert Witnesses

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson – In a series of IPR proceedings between Petitioner Adobe Inc. and Patent Owner RAH Color Technologies LLC, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board declined to extend attorney work product protection to deposition questions...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.