Jones Day's PTAB Litigation Blog, Home page
Limited Fintiv Four Stip Unpersuasive

Limited Fintiv Four Stip Unpersuasive

By Tom Ritchie - The PTAB considers the six Fintiv factors to determine whether to exercise its discretion to deny institution of an IPR petition in view of a parallel litigation.  In that analysis, Fintiv factor four requires the PTAB to evaluate the overlap between...

read more
Boardside Chat: SAS, MTAs, Fintiv, and Indefiniteness

Boardside Chat: SAS, MTAs, Fintiv, and Indefiniteness

By Andrea Beathard and Matt Johnson - On January 28, 2021, the PTAB held a Boardside Chat webinar at which three PTAB judges discussed four recent developments related to America Invents Act (“AIA”) trials. First, Vice Chief Judge Michael Tierney discussed what he...

read more
Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

By Sean Benevento*, Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson - The PTAB recently held that the General Plastic factors weighed in favor of denying a follow-on IPR petition filed after the Patent Owner filed a preliminary response to an earlier petition challenging the same...

read more
Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

By Raffaella Faraoni and Carl Kukkonen - On January 19, 2021, Petitioner, 10X Genomics, requested via email authorization to file 1) a five page brief addressing the Board’s institution decision in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Acorn Semi, LLC, IPR2020-01204, (Jan....

read more
PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

By Andrea Beathard, Sue Gerber, and Matt Johnson - Although the PTAB had previously stated that it would “rarely” be appropriate for a petitioner to file multiple petitions against the same patent, in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corp., IPR...

read more

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Archives