Jones Day's PTAB Litigation Blog, Home page
USPTO Provides Insight on AMPRM Proposals

USPTO Provides Insight on AMPRM Proposals

By Stephanie Mishaga, Emily Towers, and Matt Johnson - The USPTO issued an advance notice of proposed rules (“ANPRM”) on April 21, 2023 and is requesting comments and feedback from practitioners on proposed, proposed changes at the PTAB. The full ANPRM document is...

read more
VLSI Claims Deemed Unpatentable

VLSI Claims Deemed Unpatentable

By Adam J. Cook,* Christian Roberts, and Matt Johnson - On May 12, 2023, the Intel v. VLSI chronicle continued as the PTAB issued a final written decision holding that all of the challenged claims of VLSI’s U.S. Patent No. 7,725,759 (“the ’759 patent”) were...

read more
PTAB Panel Excuses Late Filings

PTAB Panel Excuses Late Filings

By Levent Herguner, Derek Walker,* and Matt Johnson - On May 10, 2023, a PTAB Panel excused the late filings of the Patent Owner and allowed over thirty exhibits and a Corrected Patent Owner Response (“CPOR”) to be submitted into the record in Samsung Electronics Co.,...

read more
APJ Stock Ownership Insufficient To Vacate

APJ Stock Ownership Insufficient To Vacate

By Jack Graves and Matt Johnson - On May 16, 2023, the Federal Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the Board to vacate an institution decision based on stock ownership of an administrative patent judges (“APJ”) in In re Centripetal Networks,...

read more
PTAB Issues Back-to-Back Fintiv Denials After Dry Spell

PTAB Issues Back-to-Back Fintiv Denials After Dry Spell

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson - The PTAB recently issued back-to-back Fintiv denials.  The first denial issued on May 4, 2023.  Read here about Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. California Institute of Tech., No. IPR2023-00130, Paper 10 (P.T.A.B. May 4, 2023).  And the...

read more

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Archives