by Joseph Beauchamp | May 11, 2022 | Final Written Decisions, Prior Art Issues
By Alison Ibendahl and Joe Beauchamp – In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board found that no claims challenged were unpatentable, after finding manuals relied upon as prior art did not qualify as “printed publications” under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b). ...
by Joe Sauer | Nov 15, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Final Written Decisions, Trial Institution
By Stephanie Mishaga, Joseph Sauer, and Evan McLean – It is no secret that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) often leverages its discretionary denial powers to deny inter parties review (IPR) petitions. The PTAB has discretionarily denied IPR petitions,...
by Matthew Johnson | Nov 11, 2021 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB Trial Basics
By Evan Jones* and Matt Johnson – On October 26, 2021, Chief Administrative Patent Judge (“APJ”) Boalick lifted a May 1, 2020 stay issued by the PTAB pending the Supreme Court’s consideration of Arthrex in which 103 cases were placed in “administrative...
by Matthew Johnson | May 7, 2021 | Final Written Decisions
By Andrea Beathard and Matt Johnson – Although the Federal Circuit had previously held that the PTAB may enter adverse judgment when a patent owner disclaims all claims challenged in an inter partes review (“IPR”) petition before an institution decision, in...
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 18, 2020 | Final Written Decisions
By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – The PTAB and District Courts do not always see eye to eye when it comes to prior art. On August 21, 2020, the Board issued a trio of final written decisions refusing to invalidate the claims of three patents, two of which have...
by Matthew Johnson | Nov 1, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Final Written Decisions, PTAB News
On Thursday, a panel of the Federal Circuit found that PTAB judges have to date been unconstitutional appointments. The panel thinks that it has cured that issue going forward by severing a portion of Title 35 that allows for removal of PTAB judges only for cause....
