PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • Joinder
Select Page
Trial Court Denies Amendment of Contentions To Add Reexam Claims Following Successful IPR

Trial Court Denies Amendment of Contentions To Add Reexam Claims Following Successful IPR

by Gasper LaRosa | Oct 21, 2019 | Other News, Stay

By Gasper LaRosa and Stephanie M. Brooker What happens when patent claims are found unpatentable in inter partes review (“IPR”) and new claims are subsequently added to that patent through ex parte reexamination? The District Court for the Northern District of...
Jones Day’s PTAB Litigation Blog – The Story and Rationale

Jones Day’s PTAB Litigation Blog – The Story and Rationale

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 6, 2019 | Other News

Jones Day’s PTAB Litigation Blog launched August 19, 2015.  428 posts later, it has become one of the most widely recognized and read PTAB practice blogs in existence.  Jones Day partners Dave Cochran and Matt Johnson talk about the history and rationale for the...
High Court to Tackle Whether Government Can Petition PTAB

High Court to Tackle Whether Government Can Petition PTAB

by Emily Tait | Nov 8, 2018 | Other News, PTAB Trial Basics

By: Emily Tait UPDATE: Oral Argument was held in this case in February 2019. On October 26, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al. (17-1594) to address whether the U.S. government is a “person” who may...
Is the Government a “Person” Who May Institute PTAB Trials?

Is the Government a “Person” Who May Institute PTAB Trials?

by Emily Tait | Jul 11, 2018 | Other News

By: Emily Tait and Lauren Willens UPDATE: In October, the Supreme Court granted the Petition in this case.   The America Invents Act (“AIA”) provides that a “[a] person may not file a petition for [covered business method review] unless the person or the person’s real...
District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS

District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS

by Tim Heverin | Jul 6, 2018 | Other News

By: Tim Heverin The effects of SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348 (2018), continue to reverberate throughout the PTAB and federal district courts.  In Prisusa Engineering Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM (S.D. Fla. June 12,...
Hatch Bill: Restore Hatch-Waxman Balance; Limit Generics’ Access to PTAB

Hatch Bill: Restore Hatch-Waxman Balance; Limit Generics’ Access to PTAB

by Matthew Johnson | Jul 2, 2018 | Other News

By: Alex K. Chung and Matt Johnson Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the namesake and coauthor of the Hatch-Waxman Act, proposed (but has not yet introduced) an amendment titled the “Hatch-Waxman Integrity Act of 2018” during the Senate Judiciary Committee held on June...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.