PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Denies Joinder To Settled IPR

PTAB Denies Joinder To Settled IPR

by David Maiorana | Feb 6, 2023 | Joinder, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On September 1, 2022, CommScope, Inc. (“CommScope”) filed a Petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims 8–10, 15, 24–26, and 31 of U.S. Patent No. 8,462,835 (“the ’835 Patent”) in IPR2022-01443 (“the ’443 IPR”).  The...
Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 29, 2022 | Joinder, Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – The PTAB denied a request for institution and joinder because the petitioner was the petitioner in one other instituted IPR directed to the same patent, and the petitioner did not explain adequately to the PTAB why another...
PTAB Denies Joinder Motion Filed More Than One Month After PGR Institution

PTAB Denies Joinder Motion Filed More Than One Month After PGR Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 6, 2022 | Joinder, PGR, Trial Institution

By Christian Roberts and Matt Johnson – Typically, a Motion for Joinder to an earlier post-grant review (“PGR”) must be filed within one month of the institution of the earlier PGR.  37 C.F.R. § 42.222(b).  While the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) does...
Joinder Denied For Petitioner Whose Invalidity Case Was Dismissed With Prejudice

Joinder Denied For Petitioner Whose Invalidity Case Was Dismissed With Prejudice

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 30, 2022 | Joinder, PTAB News

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – In the PTAB’s recent decision in Code 200 v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01503, Paper No. 13 (PTAB Mar. 14, 2022), the PTAB expounded upon the circumstances in which joinder of a “me-too” case under § 315(b) was not warranted.  In...
PTAB Designates RPI, Follow-On Petition Cases Precedential

PTAB Designates RPI, Follow-On Petition Cases Precedential

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 7, 2020 | Joinder, PTAB News, Real Party in Interest

On December 4th, the PTAB designated the following three cases precedential: RPX Corp. v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC, IPR2015-01750, Paper 128 (Oct. 2, 2020) (precedential) This decision on remand from the Federal Circuit holds that the petitioner was...
Joinder Bid After Prior Petition Denial Fails

Joinder Bid After Prior Petition Denial Fails

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 5, 2020 | Joinder, PTAB News

By Matt Johnson – After being sued by Uniloc in April 2018 for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,467,088 (“Reconfiguration Manager for Controlling Upgrades of Electronic Devices”), Apple challenged claims 1-21 of that patent at the PTAB in October of that year...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.