PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
How Long Is Too Long To Wait To Settle?

How Long Is Too Long To Wait To Settle?

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 30, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – An IPR “shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”  35...
Federal Circuit Holds Party Can Challenge PTAB Rulemaking

Federal Circuit Holds Party Can Challenge PTAB Rulemaking

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 27, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Anthony Bautista and Matt Johnson – In Apple, Inc. v. Katherine K. Vidal, the Federal Circuit ruled that Apple and the other plaintiffs could continue their suit on a lone surviving challenge to the PTAB Director’s rulemaking procedures regarding...
Multiple Dependent Claims are Treated as Multiple Claims

Multiple Dependent Claims are Treated as Multiple Claims

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 22, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Matt Chung and Matt Johnson – On February 24, 2023, Director Kathi Vidal issued a decision under director review granting rehearing and modifying the final written decision for Nested Bean, Inc. v. Big Beings USA Pty. Ltd. Nested Bean, Inc. (“Nested Bean”)...
PRECEDENTIAL: Compelling Merits Analysis Only When Other Factors Indicate Denial

PRECEDENTIAL: Compelling Merits Analysis Only When Other Factors Indicate Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 17, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – In IPR2022-01242, Director Vidal clarified that her prior guidance, which allows the Board to institute inter partes review even if the Fintiv factors favor discretionary denial first requires the Board to find that Fintiv...
Director Review Orders Additional Discovery On Time Bar-RPI Issue

Director Review Orders Additional Discovery On Time Bar-RPI Issue

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 10, 2023 | Discovery, Real Party in Interest

By Jesse Wynn, Robert Breetz, Matt Johnson – In Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc., the PTAB determined that a time-barred third party was not a real party in interest (“RPI”) and granted institution. IPR2022-00615, Paper 20 (Oct. 19, 2022) at 19...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.