PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Claim Construction Stipulation Avoids Discretionary Denial

Claim Construction Stipulation Avoids Discretionary Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 4, 2026 | Claim Construction, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Ian Adams, Matt Modderman, Matt Johnson – USPTO Director John Squires issued a decision on October 3, 2025, denying a request to discretionarily deny institution in Caption Health, Inc. v. The University of British Columbia, IPR2025-01422, Paper 15 at 3 (Dec....
PTAB Statistics Through Two Months of FY 2026

PTAB Statistics Through Two Months of FY 2026

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 15, 2026 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Matt Johnson – The institution rate for post-grant petitions in FY 2026 through the end of November (the period from Oct. 1, 2025 through November 30, 2025) stands at 37% (118 instituted, 197 denied).  As expected, this rate is substantially lower than the...
PTAB Voluntary Search Disclosure Declarations: A New Factor Supporting Institution

PTAB Voluntary Search Disclosure Declarations: A New Factor Supporting Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 23, 2025 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Ruth Brindel,* Daniel Sloan, and Matt Johnson On November 17, 2025, USPTO Director John Squires issued a memorandum introducing a new procedure allowing petitioners to submit a voluntary Search Disclosure Declaration (SDD) that explains the petitioner’s search...
Prosecution Error Evidence & Timing Considerations Sends IPR Forward

Prosecution Error Evidence & Timing Considerations Sends IPR Forward

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 18, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Ruth Brindel* and Matt Johnson The USPTO’s Acting Deputy Director, Coke Morgan Stewart, issued a decision on October 3, 2025, declining to exercise discretion to deny institution in Carbyne, Inc. v. Tritech Software Systems, IPR2025-00959, Paper 11 (Oct. 3 2025)....
Collateral Estoppel May Not Apply When Claim Interpretation Standards Differ

Collateral Estoppel May Not Apply When Claim Interpretation Standards Differ

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 19, 2025 | Claim Construction

By Thane Bonnett* and Matt Johnson – In its recent decision in RØDE Microphones, LLC et. al. vs. Zaxcom, Inc., the PTAB declined to apply collateral estoppel based on prior post-grant proceedings because the prior proceedings had applied a different standard of...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.