by Matthew Johnson | Oct 3, 2018 | Stay
By Matt Johnson District courts have discretionary authority to grant a motion to stay. Courts consider three factors in deciding how to exercise that discretion, the first being whether a stay will simplify the issues for trial. In Universal Secure Registry, LLC v....
by Albert Liou | Jul 24, 2018 | Stay
By: H. Albert Liou PTAB Allows Patent Owner to Stay its Own Reissue Proceeding 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. 42.122(a) vest the PTAB with the power to stay, transfer, consolidate, or terminate any matter pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office while an...
by David Maiorana | Oct 23, 2017 | Stay
By Allison Haugen and Dave Maiorana In August 2016, Google petitioned for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,552,124 (owned by IXI Mobile), asserting that claims 1–10 are unpatentable. In March 2017, the PTAB instituted the IPR as to claims 1–5, but denied...
by Matthew Johnson | Feb 8, 2017 | Stay
By Matt Johnson The multiple flavors of review and prosecution at the Patent Office produce an environment where a patent family could be subject to inconsistent results. Conceivably, patents in a pre-AIA patent family could simultaneously be subject to regular...
by Geoffrey Gavin | Nov 17, 2016 | Estoppel, Stay
By Geoffrey Gavin In Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Kemper Corporation (accessible here), No. 6:16-cv-00081, Dkt No. 57 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2016) (Slip Op.), Judge Gilstrap made clear that a defendant in East Texas seeking a stay based on a third party petitioner’s...
by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Mar 14, 2016 | Stay
The International Trade Commission (“ITC”) has never granted a stay of a Section 337 investigation in favor of an American Invents Act inter partes review (“IPR”) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). That trend...
