by Matthew Johnson | Jun 20, 2019 | Stay
By Jen Bachorik and Matt Johnson The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently denied Defendant Adobe Systems Inc.’s motion to stay litigation pending resolution of parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings before the PTAB...
by Matthew Johnson | Dec 26, 2018 | PTAB News, Stay
By Tom Ritchie and Matt Johnson In Microsoft Corp. v. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, the PTAB refused to stay ten IPRs filed by Microsoft while Patent Owner St. Regis appeals a Federal Circuit decision that tribal sovereign immunity cannot be asserted in an IPR proceeding....
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 3, 2018 | Stay
By Matt Johnson District courts have discretionary authority to grant a motion to stay. Courts consider three factors in deciding how to exercise that discretion, the first being whether a stay will simplify the issues for trial. In Universal Secure Registry, LLC v....
by Albert Liou | Jul 24, 2018 | Stay
By: H. Albert Liou PTAB Allows Patent Owner to Stay its Own Reissue Proceeding 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. 42.122(a) vest the PTAB with the power to stay, transfer, consolidate, or terminate any matter pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office while an...
by David Maiorana | Oct 23, 2017 | Stay
By Allison Haugen and Dave Maiorana In August 2016, Google petitioned for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,552,124 (owned by IXI Mobile), asserting that claims 1–10 are unpatentable. In March 2017, the PTAB instituted the IPR as to claims 1–5, but denied...
by Matthew Johnson | Feb 8, 2017 | Stay
By Matt Johnson The multiple flavors of review and prosecution at the Patent Office produce an environment where a patent family could be subject to inconsistent results. Conceivably, patents in a pre-AIA patent family could simultaneously be subject to regular...
