by Tim Heverin | Dec 7, 2018 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Tim Heverin In September, the Patent Office revised Standing Operating Procedure 2 (available here) to create a new review path for designating opinions precedential or informational. See PTAB Litigation Blog discussion of SOP 2 here. Under the new rule, the...
by Matthew Johnson | Dec 6, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics
By Yang Li Ph.D. (Alex) and Matt Johnson Among the many differences from a patent litigation in a district court, the expedited nature of an inter partes review (IPR) brings with it an obligation for the petitioner to have a full-fledged legal theory of its case right...
by Marc S. Blackman | Nov 15, 2018 | Discovery, PTAB Trial Basics
By Marc Blackman Discovery is limited in inter partes review proceedings. As we previously discussed here and here, discovery is available only “in the interest of justice,” and requests for discovery frequently are denied. Yet, a party may be aware of information...
by Emily Tait | Nov 8, 2018 | Other News, PTAB Trial Basics
By: Emily Tait On October 26, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al. (17-1594) to address whether the U.S. government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the AIA. See...
by Doug Pearson | Oct 31, 2018 | Pharmaceutical, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Doug Pearson Prior to the USPTO’s issuance of revised Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 2 on September 20, 2018 (available here), designation of Board decisions as Precedential or Informative required, among other things, nomination of a decision to the Chief...
by Matthew Johnson | Oct 30, 2018 | Pharmaceutical, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Josh Nightingale and Matt Johnson The USPTO has revised its standard operating procedure (SOP) governing the assignment of judges to panels in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases. The SOP, available here, provides guidance to Board administrative personnel...
