by Matthew Johnson | Feb 18, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB Trial Basics
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Prisua Engineering Corp., — F.3d —, 2020 WL 543427, at *4 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4. 2020), could not be more clear: “[W]e hold that the Board may...
by Matthew Johnson | Jan 13, 2020 | PTAB Trial Basics
In November 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published a second edition of the America Invents Act (AIA) Trial Practice Guide (Practice Guide) to incorporate the Practice Guide updates released in August 2018 and July 2019 into the original August...
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 27, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics
The PTAB has been very active in designating decisions precedential and informative in 2019. Here’s a recap of designations so far: Real parties in interest, 35 U.S.C. §§ 312(a)(2), 322(a)(2) Precedential – Adello Biologics LLC v. Amgen Inc., Case...
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 19, 2019 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution
By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson On September 6, 2019, a PTAB panel including USPTO Director Andrei Iancu instituted inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,279,259 (“the ‘259 Patent”). The ‘259 Patent is directed to a tile lippage removal system and is owned...
by Geoffrey Gavin | Sep 12, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics, Standing
By Geoffrey Gavin and Matt Johnson The PTAB designated as precedential a January 2019 panel decision relating to the bar on instituting an IPR under 35 U.S.C. § 315(a)(1) when the petitioner previously filed a civil action challenging the validity of the patent. See...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 27, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits
By Tom Ritchie and Matt Johnson The PTAB Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) has concluded that the one-year time bar for filing an IPR petition under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) is triggered by the service of a complaint alleging infringement even if “the serving party lacks...
