PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Motion To Strike Invalidity Defense Denied… For Now

Motion To Strike Invalidity Defense Denied… For Now

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 13, 2019 | Estoppel, PGR

By Amanda Leckman and Matt Johnson On February 28, 2019, GREE, Inc. (“GREE”) filed a Complaint against Supercell Oy (“Supercell”) for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,597,594 (the “’594 Patent”), directed to a method for controlling a computer to improve the...
Privacy Management Patent Invalidated as Abstract in Post Grant Review

Privacy Management Patent Invalidated as Abstract in Post Grant Review

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 8, 2019 | Patent Eligible Subject Matter, PGR

By Austin Ball and Matt Johnson On October 10, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued a Final Written Decision in favor of Avepoint, Inc. (“Avepoint”) and against Onetrust, LLC (“Onetrust”) in an America Invents Act post grant review (“PGR”) of...
Design Patents at PTAB – Substantially the Same vs Basically the Same

Design Patents at PTAB – Substantially the Same vs Basically the Same

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 30, 2019 | PGR

By John Evans and Kerry Barrett The PTAB’s recent decision instituting post-grant review of a design patent in Man Wah Holdings Ltd. v. Raffel provides interesting perspectives on how design patent invalidity theories work.  This decision highlights the subtle...
Supreme Court’s Interpretation Of The AIA’s On-Sale Bar And Post Grant Review

Supreme Court’s Interpretation Of The AIA’s On-Sale Bar And Post Grant Review

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 28, 2019 | PGR

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson The America Invents Act (“AIA”), also called the Patent Reform Act of 2011, was enacted to overhaul the U.S. patent system and harmonize the domestic patent laws with those in the rest of the world.  The AIA also created new procedures...
PTAB Flushes Airplane Lavatory Patent On On-Sale Bar

PTAB Flushes Airplane Lavatory Patent On On-Sale Bar

by S. Christian Platt | Nov 12, 2018 | PGR, Prior Art Issues

By Christian Platt, John Evans, and Kerry Barrett On October 23, 2018, the PTAB found unpatentable B/E Aerospace’s U.S. Design Patent No. D764,031 (“’031 patent”).  C&D Zodiac, Inc. v. B/E Aerospace, Inc., PGR2017-00019, Paper 37 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2018).  The ’031...
Statutory Estoppel Only Applies To The Same Patent Claims

Statutory Estoppel Only Applies To The Same Patent Claims

by Sue Gerber | Apr 3, 2018 | Estoppel, PGR

By: Sue Gerber While claims among patents in the same family can be very similar, such similarities are not enough for the statutory estoppel provision of 35 U.S.C. §325(e)(1) to apply.  In Telebrands Corp. v. Tinnus Enterprises, LLC, the PTAB interpreted the scope of...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.