by Matthew Johnson | Jul 28, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Petitions
By Albert Liou – The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Microsoft Corporation v. FG SRC, LLC, No. 2020-1928 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2021), is a stark reminder that an IPR petitioner must always set forth its grounds in its petition with particularity. In the...
by Joseph Beauchamp | Jul 22, 2021 | Petitions, PTAB News
By Alison Ibendahl and Joseph Beauchamp – A June 25, 2021 decision by the PTAB has clarified that when paying the filing fee via wire transfer, the inter partes review (“IPR”) petition filing date is based upon when the funds are made available to the USPTO. ...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 8, 2021 | Petitions, Trial Institution
By Ashvi Patel,* Marlee Hartenstein, and Matt Johnson In Fantasia Trading LLC v. Cognipower LLC, IPR2021-00070, Paper 21 (May 20, 2021), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declined to institute inter partes review (IPR) where Petitioner Fantasia Trading LLC...
by Matthew Johnson | Dec 28, 2020 | Petitions, Trial Institution
By Lisa Furby and Matt Johnson – The results of a recent update to the PTAB Multiple Petition Study show Petitioners face an uphill battle when attempting to utilize a multiple petition strategy. These results, discussed during the December 10, 2020 Boardside...
by Matthew Johnson | Jan 21, 2020 | Evidentiary Issues, Petitions, PTAB News
By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – A petition to institute an inter partes review (IPR) can only be filed on the basis of prior art consisting of patents and printed publications. But what makes a reference a “printed publication”? On December 20, 2019, the...
by Emily Tait | Sep 9, 2019 | Expert Witnesses, Petitions, Trial Institution
By Emily Tait The PTAB recently denied petitioner’s request for rehearing of a decision denying institution of inter partes review, rejecting the argument that the Board’s denial was based on an erroneous analysis of the “non-exhaustive” General Plastic factors. See...
