PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PGR Eligibility: An Uphill Climb For Transition Patents

PGR Eligibility: An Uphill Climb For Transition Patents

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 31, 2021 | Claim Construction, Petitions, PGR, PTAB News

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – A patent is eligible for post-grant review (“PGR”) only if the patent is subject to the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the AIA.  In Tricam Indus., Inc. v. Little Giant Ladder Sys., LLC, the PTAB explained that determining...
Printed Publications: Simply Existing Isn’t Enough

Printed Publications: Simply Existing Isn’t Enough

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 7, 2021 | Petitions, Prior Art Issues

By: Nick Bagnolo and Matt Johnson – When filing an IPR, petitioners should be careful not to take for granted one of the most fundamental aspects of challenging validity in this forum: Whether or not the relied upon references qualify as prior art.  Pursuant to...
Fed. Cir.: Don’t Expect PTAB to Do Your Work For You

Fed. Cir.: Don’t Expect PTAB to Do Your Work For You

by Matthew Johnson | Jul 28, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Petitions

By Albert Liou – The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Microsoft Corporation v. FG SRC, LLC, No. 2020-1928 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2021), is a stark reminder that an IPR petitioner must always set forth its grounds in its petition with particularity.  In the...
A Cautionary Tale: Paying IPR Filing Fees Via Wire Transfer

A Cautionary Tale: Paying IPR Filing Fees Via Wire Transfer

by Joseph Beauchamp | Jul 22, 2021 | Petitions, PTAB News

By Alison Ibendahl and Joseph Beauchamp – A June 25, 2021 decision by the PTAB has clarified that when paying the filing fee via wire transfer, the inter partes review (“IPR”) petition filing date is based upon when the funds are made available to the USPTO. ...
Awkwardly Divided Petitions Triggers § 314(a) Denials

Awkwardly Divided Petitions Triggers § 314(a) Denials

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 8, 2021 | Petitions, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel,* Marlee Hartenstein, and Matt Johnson In Fantasia Trading LLC v. Cognipower LLC, IPR2021-00070, Paper 21 (May 20, 2021), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declined to institute inter partes review (IPR) where Petitioner Fantasia Trading LLC...
Multiple-Petition Strategies Fall Into Disfavor

Multiple-Petition Strategies Fall Into Disfavor

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 28, 2020 | Petitions, Trial Institution

By Lisa Furby and Matt Johnson – The results of a recent update to the PTAB Multiple Petition Study show Petitioners face an uphill battle when attempting to utilize a multiple petition strategy.  These results, discussed during the December 10, 2020 Boardside...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.