PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Introducing Evidence Before Authorization May Result in Expungement

Introducing Evidence Before Authorization May Result in Expungement

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 10, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Motions Practice

By Christian Roberts and Matt Johnson – Introducing evidence in a motion to file a reply to a patent owner’s preliminary response without the PTAB’s authorization may result in denial and expungement.  A recent motion met such a fate in Ice Castles, LLC v....
Late Request Results In Denial Of Motion To Strike Authorization

Late Request Results In Denial Of Motion To Strike Authorization

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 9, 2021 | Motions Practice, PTAB Trial Basics

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – Patent Owner (Provisur Technologies) requested authorization to file a motion to strike portions of Petitioner’s (Weber, Inc.) Reply and certain evidence submitted therewith, which Petitioner opposed.  Patent Owner argued that...
Motion to Exclude Improper Vehicle For Addressing Non-Responsive Evidence

Motion to Exclude Improper Vehicle For Addressing Non-Responsive Evidence

by David Maiorana | Sep 23, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Motions Practice

By Lisa Furby and Dave Maiorana – In Apple, Inc. v. Parus Holdings, Inc. (IPR2020-00686), the PTAB denied the Patent Owner’s motion to exclude portions of the Petitioner’s supplemental expert declaration.  Here the Patent Owner sought to exclude a number of...
PTAB Denies Patent Owner’s Last-Minute Discovery Request

PTAB Denies Patent Owner’s Last-Minute Discovery Request

by Carl Kukkonen | Aug 16, 2021 | Discovery, Motions Practice, PTAB News, Real Party in Interest

By Carl Kukkonen – In Unified Patents, LLC f/k/a Unified Patents Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (IPR2021-00827), the PTAB denied a patent owner’s request to file a motion for additional discovery into any real...
Take Care When Modifying the PTAB’s Default Protective Order

Take Care When Modifying the PTAB’s Default Protective Order

by Josh Nightingale | Jul 9, 2021 | Motions Practice

By Sachin Patel and Josh Nightingale – After an initial denial, the PTAB recently granted Unified Patents’ motions for entry of protective order and for seal in Unified Patents, LLC v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, IPR2020-01048, Paper...
Filing Date Motion Granted Due To COVID-19

Filing Date Motion Granted Due To COVID-19

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 23, 2020 | Motions Practice, PTAB News

By Hannah Mehrle* and Matt Johnson – NeuMoDx Molecular, Inc., (Petitioner) who was otherwise barred from pursuing two IPR proceedings regarding patents owned by HandyLab, Inc. (Patent Owner) under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)’s one year deadline, filed a Motion to Change...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.