PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
No Soup for You! Partial Display Design Patent Found Obvious

No Soup for You! Partial Display Design Patent Found Obvious

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Sep 3, 2021 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit

By Kerry Barrett and John Evans – As with utility patents, a patentee can counter obviousness of a patented design by producing objective evidence that the design was non-obvious, like commercial success, copying, etc.  But to be persuasive, a nexus must exist...
Post-Arthrex PTAB Appeals Mostly Moving On From Constitutional Kerfuffle

Post-Arthrex PTAB Appeals Mostly Moving On From Constitutional Kerfuffle

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 11, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal

By John Evans, Dave Maiorana, and Steven Nosco* – This is a follow up to our earlier post about the fallout from the Supreme Court’s June 21, 2021 decision in U.S. v. Arthrex, holding that PTAB APJs were unconstitutionally appointed because they exercised “principal...
Most Arthrex Challengers Say “No Thanks” To Director Remand

Most Arthrex Challengers Say “No Thanks” To Director Remand

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 19, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By John Evans, Dave Maiorana, and Steven Nosco* – On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision in U.S. v. Arthrex, holding that PTAB APJs were unconstitutionally appointed because they exercised “principal officer” authority in their final written...
If IPR’s Not Your Bag, Consider Ex Parte Reexamination

If IPR’s Not Your Bag, Consider Ex Parte Reexamination

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jun 29, 2021 | Design Patents, PTAB News

By John Evans and Callan Foran* These days, we generally think about inter partes review as a first option to challenge patentability.  Rightly so.  But don’t forget about ex parte reexamination (“XPR”).  Even in the IPR era, patent challengers are still successfully...
Two’s a Crowd: Prior Art in Design Patent Claim Construction

Two’s a Crowd: Prior Art in Design Patent Claim Construction

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Apr 29, 2021 | Design Patents, PTAB News

By John Evans and Hannah Mehrle – On April 15, 2021, the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision in the LKQ Corp. case finding a design patent claiming a vehicle fender panel unpatentable as obvious.  IPR2020-00064, Paper No. 39 (Apr. 15, 2021).  The obviousness...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.