by John Evans, Ph.D. | Sep 13, 2019 | PTAB News
By Kerry Barrett and John Evans Inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings often arise in the context of high-stakes patent infringement litigation, and district courts frequently stay litigation pending parallel IPRs, which may fully resolve a patent-in-suit’s...
by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 21, 2019 | 325(d) issues, Prior Art Issues
By John Evans and Dave Cochran The most persuasive IPR petitions offer fresh unpatentability theories never considered before. But petitions that simply repackage old issues often don’t gain traction. So, when you’re citing prior art that was before the Examiner...
by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 30, 2019 | PGR
By John Evans and Kerry Barrett The PTAB’s recent decision instituting post-grant review of a design patent in Man Wah Holdings Ltd. v. Raffel provides interesting perspectives on how design patent invalidity theories work. This decision highlights the subtle...
by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 16, 2018 | Final Written Decisions
By: John C. Evans, Ph.D. and Aryane GaransiAchilles Heel Like utility patents, design patent validity can be challenged in inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings. Nonetheless, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB” or the “Board”) tends to reach different results...
by John Evans, Ph.D. | Feb 15, 2018 | Evidentiary Issues, Expert Witnesses
By: John Evans, Ph.D. and Dave Cochran An expert asserting that a patent claim reciting different features than the prior art is nonetheless “equivalent” to the prior art must address and account for the recited limitations head-on, or otherwise lose persuasive...
