by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 19, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By John Evans, Dave Maiorana, and Steven Nosco* – On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision in U.S. v. Arthrex, holding that PTAB APJs were unconstitutionally appointed because they exercised “principal officer” authority in their final written...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 30, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – On June 29th, the PTO issued an initial protocol for requesting Director review of a PTAB Final Written Decision according to the Supreme Court’s Arthrex decision. This Arthrex protocol is similar to the current procedure for requesting...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 21, 2021 | PTAB News
On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Arthex stating: Today, we reaffirm and apply the rule from Edmond that the exercise of executive power by inferior officers must at some level be subject to the direction and supervision of an officer...
by Sarah Geers | May 26, 2021 | Amendment Practice, Federal Circuit Appeal
By Sarah Geers – Claims added or amended during inter partes review (“IPR”) do not become part of a patent until the Patent Office officially says so by issuing an IPR certificate under 35 U.S.C. § 318(b). The patentee needs more than a Final Written Decision...
by David Maiorana | Mar 25, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Trial Institution, Uncategorized
By Robby Breetz and Dave Maiorana – In Mylan Labs Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., the Federal Circuit reaffirmed it lacked jurisdiction over appeals from the PTAB denying IPR institution, noted that it had jurisdiction over requests for mandamus, but that...
