On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Arthex stating:
Today, we reaffirm and apply the rule from Edmond that the exercise of executive power by inferior officers must at some level be subject to the direction and supervision of an
officer nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The Constitution therefore forbids the enforcement of statutory restrictions on the Director that insulate the
decisions of APJs from his direction and supervision. To be clear, the Director need not review every decision of the PTAB. What matters is that the Director have the discretion to review decisions rendered by APJs. In this way, the President remains responsible for the exercise of executive power—and through him, the exercise of executive power
remains accountable to the people. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is vacated, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
You can read the full Arthrex decision here. We will continue to monitor and report on developments here at the PTAB Blog.
Latest posts by Matthew Johnson (see all)
- Healthy Overlap Between PTAB And Trial Court Favors Denial - May 13, 2022
- Reexam References Count In Section 325(d) Analysis - May 2, 2022
- Senate Confirms Kathi Vidal as USPTO Director - April 6, 2022