PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Institutes Despite ITC Investigation

PTAB Institutes Despite ITC Investigation

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 16, 2020 | Trial Institution

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson – In 3Shape A/S v. Align Tech., Inc., IPR2020-00223, Paper 12 (May 26, 2020), the PTAB declined to deny institution of an inter partes review involving a patent challenged in a pending ITC investigation.  Despite the...
A Dissenting Opinion On Weighing The Fintiv Factors

A Dissenting Opinion On Weighing The Fintiv Factors

by Tom Ritchie | Jun 11, 2020 | Time Limits, Trial Institution

By Tom Ritchie – The PTAB has explained that it has discretion to deny an IPR petition even if the petitioner has shown that it meets the statutory threshold for institution, which requires “that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail...
PTO Proposes PTAB POPR Presumption Principle Permutation

PTO Proposes PTAB POPR Presumption Principle Permutation

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 2, 2020 | Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Christian Roberts* and Matt Johnson – On May 27, 2020, the USPTO announced a notice of proposed rulemaking that would affect IPR, PGR and CBM proceedings.  Most significantly, the proposed rules would eliminate the presumption in favor of petitioners for...
Despite Uncertain Trial Date, PTAB Denies Institution

Despite Uncertain Trial Date, PTAB Denies Institution

by Marc S. Blackman | May 28, 2020 | Time Limits, Trial Institution

By Marc Blackman – Applying the PTAB’s precedential NHK decision, the PTAB exercised its discretion to deny institution of three timely filed IPR petitions due to the advanced stage of a related district court action.  Intel Corporation v. VLSI Technology LLC,...
Appeal Vaporized: PTAB RPI Determinations Are Final

Appeal Vaporized: PTAB RPI Determinations Are Final

by Matthew Johnson | May 22, 2020 | Trial Institution

By Lisa Furby and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit’s decision in ESIP Series 2 v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC, No. 19-1659, held that the “no appeal” provision found in 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) (“Section 314(d)”) bars judicial review of PTAB determinations regarding the...
Lights Out For Solar Cell Follow-On Petition

Lights Out For Solar Cell Follow-On Petition

by David Cochran | May 4, 2020 | Trial Institution

By Dave Cochran and Robby Breetz – The PTAB denied institution of a follow on petition filed five months after an initial petition by the same petitioner, even though the two petitions were directed to different claims.[1]  The Board found no persuasive...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.