PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB News: First Arthrex Director Review Granted

PTAB News: First Arthrex Director Review Granted

by Joseph Beauchamp | Dec 14, 2021 | PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Alison Ibendahl and Joe Beauchamp – In a recent decision, Commissioner Andrew Hirschfeld, who is currently performing the functions and duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, issued the first...
PTAB Allows Input on POP Review Requests Using Online Form

PTAB Allows Input on POP Review Requests Using Online Form

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 19, 2020 | PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Matt Johnson – The PTAB has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows the submission of an amicus request addressing a pending request for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) review.  This form will enable interested parties to provide fast input on...
Federal Circuit Grants Arthrex Relief Despite Waiver Arguments

Federal Circuit Grants Arthrex Relief Despite Waiver Arguments

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 9, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – On March 30, 2020, the Federal Circuit relied on Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019) to vacate and remand several related PTAB decisions, including in proceedings where the patent owner did...
PTAB Permits Extra Briefing to Evaluate Request for Rehearing

PTAB Permits Extra Briefing to Evaluate Request for Rehearing

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 14, 2020 | Amendment Practice, Request for Reconsideration

By Levent Herguner and Matt Johnson – In a recent decision, the PTAB admitted that it erred in its prior determination of unpatentability, and authorized supplemental briefing on the patentability of substitute claims.  See Rimfrost AS v. Aker Biomarine...
Patent Owner Sanctioned For Ex Parte Communications

Patent Owner Sanctioned For Ex Parte Communications

by David Maiorana | Jan 9, 2019 | PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Dave Maiorana Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(d), communications with a Board member regarding a specific proceeding are not permitted “unless both parties have an opportunity to be involved in the communication.”  This prohibition, however, does not extend to “referring to...
Role Of Company Board Members May Impact RPI Analysis

Role Of Company Board Members May Impact RPI Analysis

by Jennifer Chheda, Ph.D. | Jan 4, 2019 | Real Party in Interest, Request for Reconsideration

By Jennifer Chheda Ph.D. and John Kinton The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently denied the request of petitioner Fasteners for Retail, Inc. (“FFR” or “petitioner”) for rehearing in connection with decisions denying the institution of inter partes review...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.