PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Discovery
  • Joinder
Select Page
Despite Granting a Request for Rehearing, the PTAB Maintained Its Finding that Teva’s Copaxone Claims Were Unpatentable as Obvious

Despite Granting a Request for Rehearing, the PTAB Maintained Its Finding that Teva’s Copaxone Claims Were Unpatentable as Obvious

by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Dec 20, 2016 | Pharmaceutical, Request for Reconsideration

By Lisamarie LoGiudice, Ph.D. and Cary Miller, Ph.D. In Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Yeda Research & Development Co. Ltd., IPR2015-00643; -00644; -00830, the PTAB granted-in-part Patent Owner Teva’s request for rehearing of the...
Next Entries »

About this blog

Follow us on Twitter

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Discovery
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

About Jones Day's PTAB Litigation Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

  • Privacy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • RSS

The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.