PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Precedential Opinion Panel to Review Same-Party Joinder

Precedential Opinion Panel to Review Same-Party Joinder

by Tim Heverin | Dec 7, 2018 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Tim Heverin In September, the Patent Office revised Standing Operating Procedure 2 (available here) to create a new review path for designating opinions precedential or informational.  See PTAB Litigation Blog discussion of SOP 2 here.  Under the new...
PTAB Bar Association Hosts Inaugural Thought Leader Summit

PTAB Bar Association Hosts Inaugural Thought Leader Summit

by Joe Sauer | Nov 29, 2018 | Amendment Practice, Claim Construction, PTAB News

By Levent Herguner, Alex Li, and Joe Sauer On Tuesday, November 13th, the PTAB Bar Association held its inaugural Thought Leader Summit.  The Summit featured two sessions on recent developments in the patent litigation field, as well as a keynote address from Acting...
BREAKING: Click-to-Call and  One-Year Time Bar – Petition for Certiorari Incoming

BREAKING: Click-to-Call and One-Year Time Bar – Petition for Certiorari Incoming

by Doug Pearson | Nov 15, 2018 | PTAB News, Time Limits

By Doug Pearson As reported in a prior post, the Federal Circuit in Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc) found in a divided 10-2 en banc decision that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation...
Revised Standard Operating Procedure 2 and the New Path to PTAB Precedent

Revised Standard Operating Procedure 2 and the New Path to PTAB Precedent

by Doug Pearson | Oct 31, 2018 | Pharmaceutical, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Doug Pearson Prior to the USPTO’s issuance of revised Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 2 on September 20, 2018 (available here), designation of Board decisions as Precedential or Informative required, among other things, nomination of a decision to the Chief...
USPTO’s Revised SOP Sheds Light on Selection of PTAB Panels

USPTO’s Revised SOP Sheds Light on Selection of PTAB Panels

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 30, 2018 | Pharmaceutical, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Josh Nightingale and Matt Johnson The USPTO has revised its standard operating procedure (SOP) governing the assignment of judges to panels in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases.  The SOP, available here, provides guidance to Board administrative personnel...
Observations: Five Months After Supreme Court SAS Institute

Observations: Five Months After Supreme Court SAS Institute

by Joe Sauer | Oct 24, 2018 | PTAB News

By David Anderson and Joe Sauer As an update to the May 15, 2018 post, available here, some post-SAS trends appear to be taking shape.  For the five-month period from May 2018 through September 2018, the PTAB issued 538 institution decisions.  Of these, the PTAB...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.