PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Federal Circuit Requests Additional Arthrex Appointments Clause Briefing

Federal Circuit Requests Additional Arthrex Appointments Clause Briefing

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 15, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Matt Johnson Following up on a November 4th oral argument (accessible here) that focused on the Arthrex Appointments Clause issue, the Federal Circuit has requested additional briefing from Polaris, Kingston, and the U.S. regarding the proper remedy for the Arthrex...
Judge Dyk Says Arthrex Remedy is Unnecessary

Judge Dyk Says Arthrex Remedy is Unnecessary

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 11, 2019 | Federal Circuit, PTAB News

By Nate Andrews and Matt Johnson Judge Dyk and Judge Newman disagree with the Arthrex remedy requiring rehearing.  In Arthrex, the Federal Circuit panel of Judges Moore, Reyna, and Chen held the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) was an...
Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 5, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson Last Thursday, the Federal Circuit found the appointments of Patent Trial and Appeal judges unconstitutional, in part because the judges do not receive sufficient oversight from the Director of the United States Patent and...
BREAKING: Federal Circuit Finds PTAB Judges Are Unconstituional Appointments

BREAKING: Federal Circuit Finds PTAB Judges Are Unconstituional Appointments

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 1, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Final Written Decisions, PTAB News

On Thursday, a panel of the Federal Circuit found that PTAB judges have to date been unconstitutional appointments.  The panel thinks that it has cured that issue going forward by severing a portion of Title 35 that allows for removal of PTAB judges only for cause....
PTAB Proposes Burden of Persuasion Rules for AIA Amendments

PTAB Proposes Burden of Persuasion Rules for AIA Amendments

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 30, 2019 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News

By Phillip S. Beck and Christian Platt On October 21, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) provided a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) concerning their rules of practice in allocating burdens...
Panel Including Director Iancu Institutes Unchallenged Petition for IPR

Panel Including Director Iancu Institutes Unchallenged Petition for IPR

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 19, 2019 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson On September 6, 2019, a PTAB panel including USPTO Director Andrei Iancu instituted inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,279,259 (“the ‘259 Patent”).  The ‘259 Patent is directed to a tile lippage removal system and is owned...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.