by Matthew Johnson | Apr 2, 2020 | PTAB News
By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – Patent litigation can be quite costly to defend against, that’s no secret. But when can a prevailing defendant recover its attorneys’ fees from the plaintiff, patent holder, and under what circumstances? Under the “American Rule,”...
by Matthew Johnson | Apr 1, 2020 | PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – On March 31, 2020, the Patent Office issued a Notice of Waiver of Patent-Related Timing Deadlines under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) passed by Congress last week. Under the due date modification authority...
by Matthew Johnson | Mar 31, 2020 | 325(d) issues, PTAB News
By Josh Nightingale and Matt Johnson – As we noted here, the PTAB recently designated two 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) cases precedential and one informative. Here is an in depth review of a first of the precedential designated decisions. On March 24, 2020, the PTAB...
by Matthew Johnson | Mar 30, 2020 | 325(d) issues, PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – Last week, the PTAB designated two 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) cases precedential and one informative. These cases discuss the Board’s process for deciding when to use their discretion to deny institution because a Petition raises issues that the...
by David Maiorana | Mar 26, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Nate Andrews, John Marlott, and Dave Maiorana – On March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied rehearing and rehearing en banc in Arthrex. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140, Order Denying Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, Dkt. 115. The...
by John Marlott | Mar 24, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Nate Andrews, John Marlott, and Dave Maiorana On Monday, March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied rehearing and rehearing en banc in the Arthrex appeal that found PTAB ALJs to be unconstitutional appointments. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No....
