by Matthew Johnson | Jan 20, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Nate Andrews and Emily Tait – January 17 Update: On January 17, each of the parties filed responses to the rehearing petitions, linked here: Government Response, Appellant Arthrex’s Response, Appellee Smith & Nephew’s Response As we have...
by Matthew Johnson | Jan 17, 2020 | PTAB News
By Nate Andrews, Jasper Tran, and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit and the patent world continue to grapple with the court’s decision in Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew. Since our last updates, the parties in Arthrex and other cases have continued the push for...
by Matthew Johnson | Jan 3, 2020 | PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – The institution rate for post-grant challenges in current FY 2020 (Oct. 1, 2019 through November 31, 2019) stands at 50% compared to 63% in the previous fiscal year. While a small sample size (88 instituted, 88 denied), this is a number that...
by Emily Tait | Dec 20, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Nate Andrews and Emily Tait – As we have previously discussed on this blog and elsewhere, the Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew has generated significant discussion and controversy in the patent world. On December 16, both parties...
by Gasper LaRosa | Dec 18, 2019 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News
By Jen Bachorik and Gasper LaRosa – In November, the PTAB Bar Association held its annual Thought Leader Summit. The Summit highlighted recent changes to PTAB practice, with a keynote address from USPTO Director Andrei Iancu. In the opening remarks, Director...
by Matthew Johnson | Dec 16, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Nate Andrews, Jasper Tran, and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew excited and disrupted the patent world. (See, Jones Day Podcast recapping Arthrex decision and fallout.) Inter partes review (IPR) reshaped patent...