PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
BREAKING: Supreme Court Says PTAB Time Bar Unappealable

BREAKING: Supreme Court Says PTAB Time Bar Unappealable

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 21, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, Time Limits

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that 35 U.S.C. § 314(d)’s statement that the “determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable” means that PTAB decisions regarding the...
Federal Circuit Grants Arthrex Relief Despite Waiver Arguments

Federal Circuit Grants Arthrex Relief Despite Waiver Arguments

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 9, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – On March 30, 2020, the Federal Circuit relied on Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019) to vacate and remand several related PTAB decisions, including in proceedings where the patent owner did...
Judges Removable-At-Will is Better than No PTAB At All

Judges Removable-At-Will is Better than No PTAB At All

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 8, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – On March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit issued a per curiam order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc in Arthrex.  See Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140, Order Denying Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, Dkt....
Timing Of Arthrex Remands Remains Fuzzy

Timing Of Arthrex Remands Remains Fuzzy

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 7, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Steph Brooker and Matt Johnson – The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has denied the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) unopposed motion to stay its mandate issued in Arthrex.  The USPTO filed its motion seeking a 90 day stay...
Judges Disagree on Arthrex, But Rehearing Vote Fails

Judges Disagree on Arthrex, But Rehearing Vote Fails

by David Maiorana | Mar 26, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Nate Andrews, John Marlott, and Dave Maiorana – On March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied rehearing and rehearing en banc in Arthrex.  Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140, Order Denying Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, Dkt. 115.  The...
Arthrex en banc Denied – The Big Picture

Arthrex en banc Denied – The Big Picture

by John Marlott | Mar 24, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Nate Andrews, John Marlott, and Dave Maiorana On Monday, March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied rehearing and rehearing en banc in the Arthrex appeal that found PTAB ALJs to be unconstitutional appointments.   Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.