PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
IPR Estoppel A Paper Tiger?

IPR Estoppel A Paper Tiger?

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 26, 2022 | District Court, Estoppel, PTAB News

By Lisa Furby, John Evans, and Michelle Smit – After a final written decision issues, an IPR petitioner is statutorily estopped from going back to the district court and arguing that the same claims are “invalid on any ground that the petitioner raised or...
The Board Declines To Apply Interference Estoppel

The Board Declines To Apply Interference Estoppel

by Josh Nightingale | Jul 27, 2022 | Estoppel, PTAB News

By Ryan Camp,* Sachin Patel, and Josh Nightingale – On June 14, 2022, the Board instituted Zynga Inc.’s (“Zynga”) petition for IPR against U.S. Patent No. 7,168,089 (the “’089 patent”), rejecting Patent Owner IGT’s argument that interference estoppel should preclude...
Coordinate Arguments To Avoid Procedural Bars

Coordinate Arguments To Avoid Procedural Bars

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 15, 2022 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit Appeal

By Dylan Burdelik,* Sachin Patel, and Matt Johnson – In a recent decision, 25 F.4th 1035 (Fed. Cir. 2022), the Federal Circuit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction an appeal of the PTAB’s decision that estopped a Petitioner from maintaining a third IPR that...
PGR Estoppel Continues to be Broad and Onerous

PGR Estoppel Continues to be Broad and Onerous

by Josh Nightingale | Mar 24, 2022 | Estoppel, PGR

By Hannah Mehrle and Josh Nightingale – An ITC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recently issued an initial determination holding that PGR estoppel prevented GMG Products LLC (Respondent) from raising two prior-art products in the ITC.  Under Section 325(e)(2) of...
DON’T SAVE THE BEST: FEDERAL CIRCUIT CONFIRMS BROAD IPR ESTOPPEL

DON’T SAVE THE BEST: FEDERAL CIRCUIT CONFIRMS BROAD IPR ESTOPPEL

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 22, 2022 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit Appeal

By Ana Teixeira and Matt Johnson – The patent fight between Caltech and Broadcom/Apple made waves this month when the Federal Circuit vacated the $1.1 billion infringement award that Caltech had won in district court. To PTAB practitioners, however, the sea...
DON’T SAVE THE BEST: FEDERAL CIRCUIT CONFIRMS BROAD IPR ESTOPPEL

Leahy-Corbin Proposals for “Restoring the America Invents Act”

by Sarah Geers | Oct 22, 2021 | Amendment Practice, Estoppel, PTAB News, Standing, Stay

By Sarah Geers – We recently reported on bipartisan legislation introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy (D) and John Cornyn (R) to significantly revamp certain features of the America Invents Act (AIA), ten years after its debut.  This proposed legislation,...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.