PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
No Rehearing Response During POP Request Pendency

No Rehearing Response During POP Request Pendency

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 19, 2021 | Uncategorized

By Laura Kanouse* and Matt Johnson – In Sand Revolution II, LLC v. Continental Intermodal Group-Trucking LLC, IPR2019-1393, Paper 19, (PTAB April, 7 2020), the Board denied briefing based on a lack of jurisdiction while the Precedential Opinion Panel request was...
Boardside Chat: SAS, MTAs, Fintiv, and Indefiniteness

Boardside Chat: SAS, MTAs, Fintiv, and Indefiniteness

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 12, 2021 | Amendment Practice, Trial Institution

By Andrea Beathard and Matt Johnson – On January 28, 2021, the PTAB held a Boardside Chat webinar at which three PTAB judges discussed four recent developments related to America Invents Act (“AIA”) trials. First, Vice Chief Judge Michael Tierney discussed what...
Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 10, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Sean Benevento*, Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently held that the General Plastic factors weighed in favor of denying a follow-on IPR petition filed after the Patent Owner filed a preliminary response to an earlier petition challenging the same...
Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 5, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Raffaella Faraoni and Carl Kukkonen – On January 19, 2021, Petitioner, 10X Genomics, requested via email authorization to file 1) a five page brief addressing the Board’s institution decision in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Acorn Semi, LLC, IPR2020-01204,...
PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 3, 2021 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Andrea Beathard, Sue Gerber, and Matt Johnson – Although the PTAB had previously stated that it would “rarely” be appropriate for a petitioner to file multiple petitions against the same patent, in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corp.,...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.