PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Cert Petition Seeks Review of Time-Bar Trigger for Voluntarily Dismissed Complaints

Cert Petition Seeks Review of Time-Bar Trigger for Voluntarily Dismissed Complaints

by Greg Castanias | Jan 17, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, Time Limits

By Greg Castanias and Doug Pearson On January 11, 2019, Dex Media filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari seeking review of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 899 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (en banc in relevant part). ...
Do Only Certain IPR Petitioners Have Standing To Appeal Adverse PTAB Decisions?

Do Only Certain IPR Petitioners Have Standing To Appeal Adverse PTAB Decisions?

by John Marlott | Dec 28, 2018 | Federal Circuit Appeal

By John Marlott – Estimates are that roughly 80% of IPRs involve a challenge to a patent being asserted against the petitioner in a district court litigation.  Typically, in those IPRs, if the litigation-defendant-petitioner loses at the PTAB, there is no...
PODCAST: After SAS Institute – A Shift in PTAB Patent Litigation Strategies

PODCAST: After SAS Institute – A Shift in PTAB Patent Litigation Strategies

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 5, 2018 | Trial Institution

In its April 2018 decision in SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when conducting an inter partes review, the U.S. Patent Office must determine the patentability of each of the claims challenged by the petitioner. Jones Day partners Dave...
SCOTUS Rejects Petition To Review Section 325(d)

SCOTUS Rejects Petition To Review Section 325(d)

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 3, 2018 | 325(d) issues

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson On November 19, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rejected a petition to review the PTAB’s refusal to deny IPR institution under § 325(d), in a case where the challenged patent had survived several previous validity...
Observations: Five Months After Supreme Court SAS Institute

Observations: Five Months After Supreme Court SAS Institute

by Joe Sauer | Oct 24, 2018 | PTAB News

By David Anderson and Joe Sauer As an update to the May 15, 2018 post, available here, some post-SAS trends appear to be taking shape.  For the five-month period from May 2018 through September 2018, the PTAB issued 538 institution decisions.  Of these, the PTAB...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.