by Matthew Johnson | Oct 8, 2020 | Real Party in Interest
By Matt Johnson – Throughout the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) history, patent owners have tried to leverage a petitioner’s alleged failure to name all real parties-in-interest (“RPIs”) as a way to achieve denial of an inter partes review (“IPR”)...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 29, 2020 | Real Party in Interest
By Steph Brooker, Robby Breetz, Matt Johnson, and Tom Ritchie – Throughout the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) history, patent owners have tried to leverage a petitioner’s alleged failure to name all real parties-in-interest (“RPIs”) as a way to achieve...
by Marc S. Blackman | Mar 21, 2020 | Real Party in Interest
By Marc Blackman – In three related final written decisions, the PTAB ruled that Bayer Healthcare (“Bayer”) was not a real party in interest (“RPI”) to IPR petitions filed by NOF Corporation, even though Bayer had a business relationship with NOF and stood to...
by Matthew Johnson | Mar 11, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Real Party in Interest, Time Limits
By Cathy Chin Eng and Matt Johnson – In two related decisions, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Owner, Acoustic Technology, Inc. (“Acoustic”) waived its time-bar challenges under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) (“Section 315(b)”) by failing to assert them in the IPR...
by Matthew Johnson | Jan 28, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Real Party in Interest
By Robby Breetz and Matt Johnson Determining the Real Party-in-Interest (“RPI”) in an IPR can have critical implications for estoppel. A patent owner can prevent institution of an IPR by showing that an RPI has previously “filed a civil action challenging the...
by David Maiorana | Nov 7, 2019 | Real Party in Interest, Trial Institution
By Robby Breetz and Dave Maiorana To institute an inter partes review (IPR), the petition requesting the proceeding must be filed within one year of the petitioner or real party in interest (RPI) receiving a complaint alleging patent infringement. 35 U.S.C. §...
