PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Revokes Filing Privileges For Repeated Rules Violations

PTAB Revokes Filing Privileges For Repeated Rules Violations

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 22, 2018 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Matt Johnson In September 2017, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe moved to dismiss six instituted trials on petitions filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.  Those petitions challenged six patents that, at the time the petitions were filed, belonged to Allergan, Inc.  The...
PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative

PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 16, 2018 | PTAB News, Time Limits, Trial Institution

By Rich Graham and Matt Johnson On January 10, 2018, the PTAB designated two decisions weighing on 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) as informative: Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. McGinley, IPR2017-01216, Paper 13 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 18, 2017) (AIA § 315(b), insufficient funds at filing) Amneal...
PTAB Recognizes Limits to Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity

PTAB Recognizes Limits to Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity

by Joe Sauer | Jan 8, 2018 | PTAB News

By Joe Sauer and Dave Cochran In a pair of near identical decisions issued on December 19, 2017, an expanded PTAB panel found that the Regents of the University of Minnesota had waived its defense of sovereign immunity by filing actions against the petitioners in...
District Court Considers IPR In Deciding Alice Motion

District Court Considers IPR In Deciding Alice Motion

by S. Christian Platt | Dec 15, 2017 | PTAB News

By Doug Clark and Christian Platt On November 20, 2017, a district court denied a defendant’s Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) motion that sought to dismiss the case on the ground that the asserted patents were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ...
Supreme Court Reviews Constitutionality of PTAB Proceedings

Supreme Court Reviews Constitutionality of PTAB Proceedings

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 1, 2017 | PTAB News

By Matt Johnson On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the constitutionality of PTAB post-grant trials in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, No. 16-712 (U.S.).  The question posed to the Court is “Whether inter partes...
SAS Institute Argues Before Supreme Court Against PTAB’s Partial-Decision Practice

SAS Institute Argues Before Supreme Court Against PTAB’s Partial-Decision Practice

by Greg Castanias | Nov 29, 2017 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB News

By Greg Castanias, John Marlott, and Dave Cochran In a closely followed case before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of SAS Institute Inc., a cross-office, cross-practice Jones Day team has challenged the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) practice to elect to...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.