PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PODCAST – Appointments of PTAB Judges Ruled Unconstitutional – Now What

PODCAST – Appointments of PTAB Judges Ruled Unconstitutional – Now What

by David Cochran | Dec 13, 2019 | PTAB News

In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., the Federal Circuit has held that appointments of Administrative Patent Judges of the PTAB were in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Jones Day’s Matt Johnson and Dave Cochran discuss the...
Notes from House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Arthrex

Notes from House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Arthrex

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 21, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet conducted a hearing to discuss recent court decisions, namely the Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex.  Previously...
Government to Request Arthrex Rehearing; Rush for Remands Slowed

Government to Request Arthrex Rehearing; Rush for Remands Slowed

by Joe Sauer | Nov 20, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Robby Breetz and Joe Sauer On October 31, 2019 a panel of Federal Circuit Judges issued the Arthrex Inc. v. Smith and Nephew, Inc. opinion finding the appointment of PTAB judges unconstitutional by violating the Appointments Clause.  The panel’s remedy in that case...
Federal Circuit Requests Additional Arthrex Appointments Clause Briefing

Federal Circuit Requests Additional Arthrex Appointments Clause Briefing

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 15, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Matt Johnson Following up on a November 4th oral argument (accessible here) that focused on the Arthrex Appointments Clause issue, the Federal Circuit has requested additional briefing from Polaris, Kingston, and the U.S. regarding the proper remedy for the Arthrex...
Judge Dyk Says Arthrex Remedy is Unnecessary

Judge Dyk Says Arthrex Remedy is Unnecessary

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 11, 2019 | Federal Circuit, PTAB News

By Nate Andrews and Matt Johnson Judge Dyk and Judge Newman disagree with the Arthrex remedy requiring rehearing.  In Arthrex, the Federal Circuit panel of Judges Moore, Reyna, and Chen held the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) was an...
Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 5, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson Last Thursday, the Federal Circuit found the appointments of Patent Trial and Appeal judges unconstitutional, in part because the judges do not receive sufficient oversight from the Director of the United States Patent and...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.