by Matthew Johnson | Jul 24, 2020 | Trial Institution
By Jen Bachorik and Matt Johnson – In Ericsson Inc. v. Uniloc 2017, LLC, IPR2019-01550 (PTAB March 17, 2020) (Paper 8), the PTAB denied institution of inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 314, exercising its discretion to deny “follow-on petitions” challenging...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 14, 2020 | PTAB News
By Stephanie M. Brooker and Matthew Johnson – Less experienced patent practitioners may be granted additional oral argument time in front of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) with the Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP). LEAP helps foster...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 10, 2020 | Trial Institution
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – Recently, we reported about the Supreme Court’s decision holding that the AIA’s “no appeal” provision in 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) means that the PTAB’s decision not to institute IPR because a petition is time barred under 35 U.S.C....
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 1, 2020 | Claim Construction, Trial Institution
By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – On June 18, 2020, the PTAB denied an IPR petition because the Petitioner failed to sufficiently construe the means-plus-limitations of the challenged claims. Mattersight Corporation (“Mattersight”) owns the challenged patent,...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 29, 2020 | Real Party in Interest
By Steph Brooker, Robby Breetz, Matt Johnson, and Tom Ritchie – Throughout the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) history, patent owners have tried to leverage a petitioner’s alleged failure to name all real parties-in-interest (“RPIs”) as a way to achieve...
