PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
BREAKING: Arthrex Headed to the Supreme Court

BREAKING: Arthrex Headed to the Supreme Court

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 13, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Matt Johnson – On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the three appeals from the Federal Circuit’s Arthrex decision, consolidating those three cases for briefing and argument.  The questions to be presented are as follows: 1. Whether, for...
Federal Circuit’s Applications in Internet Time Decision Applied

Federal Circuit’s Applications in Internet Time Decision Applied

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 8, 2020 | Real Party in Interest

By Matt Johnson – Throughout the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) history, patent owners have tried to leverage a petitioner’s alleged failure to name all real parties-in-interest (“RPIs”) as a way to achieve denial of an inter partes review (“IPR”)...
PTAB Reconsiders Unappealable § 315(b) Issue On Remand

PTAB Reconsiders Unappealable § 315(b) Issue On Remand

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 2, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Time Limits

By Matt Johnson – Current PTAB-relevant case law dictates: 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) “unambiguously precludes the Director from instituting an IPR if the petition seeking institution is filed more than one year after the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of...
PTAB Presents Precedential Opinion Recommendation Portal

PTAB Presents Precedential Opinion Recommendation Portal

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 25, 2020 | PTAB News

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows any member of the public to nominate any PTAB decision for precedential or informative designation. Those nominating a decision must provide a case number, case name,...
PTAB Decision Conflicts With District Court’s

PTAB Decision Conflicts With District Court’s

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 18, 2020 | Final Written Decisions

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – The PTAB and District Courts do not always see eye to eye when it comes to prior art.  On August 21, 2020, the Board issued a trio of final written decisions refusing to invalidate the claims of three patents, two of which have...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.