PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

Follow-On Petitions Must Be Justified and Timely

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 10, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Sean Benevento*, Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently held that the General Plastic factors weighed in favor of denying a follow-on IPR petition filed after the Patent Owner filed a preliminary response to an earlier petition challenging the same...
Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

Request for Second Fintiv Preliminary Reply Denied

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 5, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Raffaella Faraoni and Carl Kukkonen – On January 19, 2021, Petitioner, 10X Genomics, requested via email authorization to file 1) a five page brief addressing the Board’s institution decision in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Acorn Semi, LLC, IPR2020-01204,...
PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

PTAB Greenlights Three Petitions Against One Patent

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 3, 2021 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Andrea Beathard, Sue Gerber, and Matt Johnson – Although the PTAB had previously stated that it would “rarely” be appropriate for a petitioner to file multiple petitions against the same patent, in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corp.,...
Jones Day’s Fintiv-ITC Developments Tracker

Jones Day’s Fintiv-ITC Developments Tracker

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 22, 2021 | Trial Institution

By Michael Oblon, Matt Johnson, and Nick Bagnolo – Although first briefly mentioned as a possibility in the August 2018 Trial Practice Guide Update (page 10), outside of one instance (Bio-Rad Labs. v. 10X Genomics, IPR2019-00567; -00568, August 8, 2019), PTAB...
PTO Publishes Executive Summary Of AIA-Institution Comments

PTO Publishes Executive Summary Of AIA-Institution Comments

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 22, 2021 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

On January 19th, the PTO published an Executive Summary encapsulating stakeholder feedback received from the October 20, 2020 Request for Comments on institution of America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings. The USPTO received 822 comments from a wide range of...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.