by Matthew Johnson | Jul 21, 2021 | PTAB News
The United States Supreme Court has delivered its decision in U.S. v. Arthrex, which determined whether appointments of administrative patent judges to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were constitutional. Jones Day’s Matt...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 14, 2021 | Prior Art Issues
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – This blog has previously discussed the Federal Circuit’s decision in Becton, Dickinson and Co. v. Baxter Corp. Englewood, — F.3d —, No. 2020-1937, 2021 WL 2176796 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2021). See Telepharma Disconnect: ...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 7, 2021 | PTAB News
By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson – In its July 1st Boardside Chat, the PTAB discussed the Supreme Court’s recent Arthrex decision and the interim procedure for Director review. The panel included Drew Hirschfeld (Performing the functions and duties of the...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 2, 2021 | Trial Institution
By Andrea Beathard and Matt Johnson – A Sotera-style stipulation has once again convinced the PTAB to not exercise its discretion to deny institution of inter partes review (“IPR”) under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). In Ocado Group PLC v. AutoStore Technology AS,...
by Matthew Johnson | Jun 30, 2021 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News
By Matt Johnson – On June 29th, the PTO issued an initial protocol for requesting Director review of a PTAB Final Written Decision according to the Supreme Court’s Arthrex decision. This Arthrex protocol is similar to the current procedure for requesting...
