PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Reset One-Year Time Bar

Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Reset One-Year Time Bar

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 30, 2018 | Time Limits

By: Alex K. Chung Ph.D. and Matt Johnson In Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit found that a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation does not reset the one-year...
A Truism that Once Again Bears Repeating: Don’t Wait Until the Last Minute

A Truism that Once Again Bears Repeating: Don’t Wait Until the Last Minute

by Emily Tait | Aug 24, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits

By: Emily Tait A recent decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) denying a petition for inter partes review serves as a stark reminder of the oft-repeated truism, “don’t wait until the last minute.”  See VIZIO, Inc. v. ATI Techs. ULC, Case IPR2018-00560...
When is it too late to petition for IPR?

When is it too late to petition for IPR?

by Greg Castanias | May 1, 2018 | Federal Circuit, Time Limits

By: Jason M. Garr, John Marlott, and Greg Castanias By statute, an IPR cannot be instituted if the petitioner, real party in interest, or its “privy” was sued for infringing the patent more than one year before the petition for the IPR.  35 U.S.C. § 315(b).  As we...
Seeking Adverse Judgment After Disclaimer?  Ask For It Quickly

Seeking Adverse Judgment After Disclaimer? Ask For It Quickly

by Kenneth Luchesi | Mar 20, 2018 | PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits

By: Kenny Luchesi disclaimer A few weeks ago, we posted an article discussing the Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 880 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2018).  (see Disclaimer Before Institution May Not Avoid Adverse Judgment Estoppel).  In...
When is it too late to petition for IPR?

PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 16, 2018 | PTAB News, Time Limits, Trial Institution

By Rich Graham and Matt Johnson On January 10, 2018, the PTAB designated two decisions weighing on 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) as informative: Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. McGinley, IPR2017-01216, Paper 13 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 18, 2017) (AIA § 315(b), insufficient funds at filing) Amneal...
Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Reset One-Year Time Bar

En Banc Federal Circuit Majority Rules Time-Bar Determinations By PTAB Are Appealable

by Greg Castanias | Jan 9, 2018 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Time Limits

By Greg Castanias, Sasha Mayergoyz, John Marlott, and Dave Cochran In yesterday’s en banc decision in Wi-Fi One v. Broadcom Corp., Nos. 15-1944, -1945 & -1946 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2018), the en banc Federal Circuit addressed issues regarding judicial review of the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.