PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Applying Fintiv to a Parallel ITC Investigation

Applying Fintiv to a Parallel ITC Investigation

by S. Christian Platt | Jun 10, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Stay, Trial Institution

By Sabrina Bellantoni & S. Christian Platt – The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) recently denied institution of an inter partes review (“IPR”), exercising its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and Apple Inc. v. Fintiv Inc., IPR2020-00019 (PTAB Mar....
Court Opts Not To Stay Without Trial Instituted On All Asserted Patents

Court Opts Not To Stay Without Trial Instituted On All Asserted Patents

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 27, 2023 | Stay, Trial Institution

By Jessica Vedrani*, Misti Blount, and Matt Johnson – Congress implemented the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) to “establish a more efficient and streamlined patent system that [would] improve patent quality and limit unnecessary and counterproductive...
FWDs Issue in the Nick of Time to Suspend ITC Orders

FWDs Issue in the Nick of Time to Suspend ITC Orders

by Emily Tait | Feb 15, 2023 | PTAB News, Stay

By Steve Bradley, Emily Tait, and Marc Blackman – After finding that Apple infringed certain AliveCor patents related to wearable devices capable of monitoring a user’s cardiac activity, the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) entered a limited exclusion...
Leahy-Corbin Proposals for “Restoring the America Invents Act”

Leahy-Corbin Proposals for “Restoring the America Invents Act”

by Sarah Geers | Oct 22, 2021 | Amendment Practice, Estoppel, PTAB News, Standing, Stay

By Sarah Geers – We recently reported on bipartisan legislation introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy (D) and John Cornyn (R) to significantly revamp certain features of the America Invents Act (AIA), ten years after its debut.  This proposed legislation,...
Staying Still: District Court Extends Stay Pending Appeal

Staying Still: District Court Extends Stay Pending Appeal

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 6, 2021 | Stay

By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – District courts commonly stay patent litigation cases pending inter parties review (IPR) that assesses the validity of the patents-in-suit before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).  Such stay may be lifted or extended at...
Trial Court Denies Amendment of Contentions To Add Reexam Claims Following Successful IPR

Trial Court Denies Amendment of Contentions To Add Reexam Claims Following Successful IPR

by Gasper LaRosa | Oct 21, 2019 | Other News, Stay

By Gasper LaRosa and Stephanie M. Brooker What happens when patent claims are found unpatentable in inter partes review (“IPR”) and new claims are subsequently added to that patent through ex parte reexamination? The District Court for the Northern District of...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.