PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Fintiv Factor Cases Designated Precedential

Fintiv Factor Cases Designated Precedential

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 18, 2020 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

On December 17th, the PTAB designated two decisions applying the Fintiv factors as precedential.  We will break these cases down in detail in the coming days on the PTAB Litigation Blog. Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corporation, IPR2020-01019, Paper 12 (Dec. 1,...
Fed. Cir. Reaffirms No State Sovereign Immunity in IPRs

Fed. Cir. Reaffirms No State Sovereign Immunity in IPRs

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 17, 2020 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – In a non-precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit recently reaffirmed that state universities cannot use sovereign immunity to avoid patent challenges at the PTAB stating that, “sovereign immunity does not apply to IPR...
BREAKING: PTAB Publishes Final Rule Package

BREAKING: PTAB Publishes Final Rule Package

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 8, 2020 | Evidentiary Issues, Expert Witnesses, PTAB News

By Matt Johnson – On December 8th, the PTAB published a Final Rule, formalizing a number of PTAB practices dictated by case law and described in the current Trial Practice Guide.  The one substantive change of note is the removal to deference to the...
PTAB Designates RPI, Follow-On Petition Cases Precedential

PTAB Designates RPI, Follow-On Petition Cases Precedential

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 7, 2020 | Joinder, PTAB News, Real Party in Interest

On December 4th, the PTAB designated the following three cases precedential: RPX Corp. v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC, IPR2015-01750, Paper 128 (Oct. 2, 2020) (precedential) This decision on remand from the Federal Circuit holds that the petitioner was...
Filing Date Motion Granted Due To COVID-19

Filing Date Motion Granted Due To COVID-19

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 23, 2020 | Motions Practice, PTAB News

By Hannah Mehrle* and Matt Johnson – NeuMoDx Molecular, Inc., (Petitioner) who was otherwise barred from pursuing two IPR proceedings regarding patents owned by HandyLab, Inc. (Patent Owner) under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)’s one year deadline, filed a Motion to Change...
PTAB Allows Input on POP Review Requests Using Online Form

PTAB Allows Input on POP Review Requests Using Online Form

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 19, 2020 | PTAB News, Request for Reconsideration

By Matt Johnson – The PTAB has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows the submission of an amicus request addressing a pending request for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) review.  This form will enable interested parties to provide fast input on...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.