PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Experts and Expert Testimony in PTAB Proceedings

Experts and Expert Testimony in PTAB Proceedings

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 27, 2022 | Evidentiary Issues, Expert Witnesses

By Stephanie Mishaga and Matt Johnson – In a recent Boardside Chat webinar, a panel made up of PTAB judges and practicing attorneys discussed the use of experts and expert testimony in American Invents Act (AIA) proceedings.  The panelists stressed that...
PTAB Strikes Two Untimely Exhibits

PTAB Strikes Two Untimely Exhibits

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 8, 2022 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues

By Julia Paschwitz* and Matt Johnson – On September 21, 2021 a PTAB panel granted a motion to strike two Exhibits as not timely submitted by the Petitioner in Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Kannuu PTY LTD, IPR2020-00738. Those exhibits were submitted by...
“Voluntary Interrogatory Responses” Excluded As Inadmissible Hearsay

“Voluntary Interrogatory Responses” Excluded As Inadmissible Hearsay

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 23, 2022 | Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – While creativity has its place in advocacy, it can be taken too far.  The Petitioner learned this lesson the hard way in Unified Patents Inc. v. American Patents LLC, IPR2019-00482, Paper 132 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2022).  In this...
Library Indexing Insufficient to Establish Public Accessibility

Library Indexing Insufficient to Establish Public Accessibility

by Carl Kukkonen | Aug 17, 2022 | Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News

By Carl Kukkonen – In Salesforce.com, Inc. v. WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development, the Board denied institution of inter partes review of a patent directed to providing content to a limited display terminal (e.g., a PDA) because...
Limited Experiment Protocol Discovery Granted

Limited Experiment Protocol Discovery Granted

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 22, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues

By Paxton Lozano* and Matt Johnson – In an inter partes review (IPR), the scope of discovery is expressly stated in the C.F.R. and additional discovery must either be agreed upon by the parties or granted by the Board when it “is necessary in the interest of...
PTAB Denies IPR Institutions Without Patent Owner Rebuttal Evidence

PTAB Denies IPR Institutions Without Patent Owner Rebuttal Evidence

by Joe Sauer | Nov 15, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Final Written Decisions, Trial Institution

By Stephanie Mishaga, Joseph Sauer, and Evan McLean – It is no secret that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) often leverages its discretionary denial powers to deny inter parties review (IPR) petitions.  The PTAB has discretionarily denied IPR petitions,...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.