PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
When Is A Timely IPR Petition Not Timely Enough?

When Is A Timely IPR Petition Not Timely Enough?

by Marc S. Blackman | Sep 17, 2018 | Time Limits

By: Marc Blackman Timely IPR Petition A petition for inter partes review is timely if it is filed within one year of service of a complaint alleging infringement of the challenged patent on the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner.  35 U.S.C....
Institution Denied:  Pending Federal Circuit Appeal Warrants Denial of IPR

Institution Denied: Pending Federal Circuit Appeal Warrants Denial of IPR

by Marc S. Blackman | Jul 28, 2018 | Trial Institution

By: Marc S. Blackman The PTAB recently exercised its discretion to deny institution of an IPR proceeding because a potentially dispositive claim construction issue was pending before the Federal Circuit.  Comtech Mobile Datacom Corp v. Vehicle IP, LLC, Case...
Patent Transfer to Native American Tribe Does Not Immunize Patents from Inter Partes Review

Patent Transfer to Native American Tribe Does Not Immunize Patents from Inter Partes Review

by Marc S. Blackman | Jul 26, 2018 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By: Marc S. Blackman, Lisa L. Furby, and John Normile The Federal Circuit, in a matter of first impression, has ruled that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply to inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings. Allergan, the maker of Restasis, a chronic...
Indefiniteness Standard Applicable in PGRs: Reasonably Certain or Clear?

Indefiniteness Standard Applicable in PGRs: Reasonably Certain or Clear?

by Marc S. Blackman | Jun 7, 2018 | Claim Construction, Federal Circuit, PTAB Trial Basics

By: Marc S. Blackman Whether a claim is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112 is analyzed under different standards by District Courts and the PTAB.  District Courts apply the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Nautilus requiring a patent’s claims, viewed in...
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.