PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Reconsiders Unappealable § 315(b) Issue On Remand

PTAB Reconsiders Unappealable § 315(b) Issue On Remand

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 2, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Time Limits

By Matt Johnson – Current PTAB-relevant case law dictates: 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) “unambiguously precludes the Director from instituting an IPR if the petition seeking institution is filed more than one year after the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of...
PTAB Presents Precedential Opinion Recommendation Portal

PTAB Presents Precedential Opinion Recommendation Portal

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 25, 2020 | PTAB News

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has added an online form to the USPTO website that allows any member of the public to nominate any PTAB decision for precedential or informative designation. Those nominating a decision must provide a case number, case name,...
PTAB Decision Conflicts With District Court’s

PTAB Decision Conflicts With District Court’s

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 18, 2020 | Final Written Decisions

By Mike Lavine and Matt Johnson – The PTAB and District Courts do not always see eye to eye when it comes to prior art.  On August 21, 2020, the Board issued a trio of final written decisions refusing to invalidate the claims of three patents, two of which have...
2020 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference Rescheduled

2020 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference Rescheduled

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 15, 2020 | PTAB News

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – After having to be postponed due to coronavirus concerns, the 2020 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference has now been rescheduled and is going forward on September 24-25, 2020, with pre-conference sessions being held September...
How Does the PTAB Exercise Discretion Under § 314(a)?

How Does the PTAB Exercise Discretion Under § 314(a)?

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 1, 2020 | Trial Institution

By Alex Li and Matt Johnson The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has the discretion to deny institution of any inter partes review (IPR).  Such discretionary denial may be based on a variety of considerations, such as the existence of an ongoing district court...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.