PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Error Apparent?  Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Errors in Prior Art

Error Apparent? Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Errors in Prior Art

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 22, 2022 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News

By Sean Benevento, Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson – In LG Electronics v. Immervision, the Federal Circuit clarified the standard for evaluating whether a prior art reference includes an obvious typographical error.  See 39 F.4th 1364, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2022). Under...
PTAB Strikes Two Untimely Exhibits

PTAB Strikes Two Untimely Exhibits

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 8, 2022 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues

By Julia Paschwitz* and Matt Johnson – On September 21, 2021 a PTAB panel granted a motion to strike two Exhibits as not timely submitted by the Petitioner in Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Kannuu PTY LTD, IPR2020-00738. Those exhibits were submitted by...
“Voluntary Interrogatory Responses” Excluded As Inadmissible Hearsay

“Voluntary Interrogatory Responses” Excluded As Inadmissible Hearsay

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 23, 2022 | Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – While creativity has its place in advocacy, it can be taken too far.  The Petitioner learned this lesson the hard way in Unified Patents Inc. v. American Patents LLC, IPR2019-00482, Paper 132 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2022).  In this...
PTAB Institutes PGR, Denies Conditional IPR Petition

PTAB Institutes PGR, Denies Conditional IPR Petition

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 19, 2022 | PGR, Trial Institution

By Nicolas Aalberg,* Evan Jones, and Matt Johnson – On June 10, 2022, the PTAB in Apple Inc. v. MemoryWeb LLC denied Apple’s “conditional” IPR petition but instituted review of Apple’s concurrently-filed PGR petition, finding that MemoryWeb’s U.S. Patent No....
IDS Initials Insufficient to Show Examiner Did Not Err

IDS Initials Insufficient to Show Examiner Did Not Err

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 4, 2022 | 325(d) issues, PTAB News

By Ibrahim Ijaz,* Evan Jones, and Matt Johnson – On July 6, 2022, a panel of three Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) administrative patent judges granted institution of inter partes review (“IPR”) in STMicroelectronics, Inc. v. Trustees of Purdue...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.