PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Patent Owner Unable To Dodge PGR Due To Inadequate Written Description

Patent Owner Unable To Dodge PGR Due To Inadequate Written Description

by David Maiorana | Sep 15, 2022 | PGR, PTAB News

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – U.S. Patent No. 9,157,017 (“the ’017 Patent”) is assigned to Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) and is titled, “Compositions Containing Fluorine Substituted Olefins and Methods and Systems Using Same.”  The detailed...
Interim Procedure for Discretionary Denials Established

Interim Procedure for Discretionary Denials Established

by David Maiorana | Jul 15, 2022 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On June 21, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal issued a memorandum concerning the PTAB’s practice of determining whether to institute an AIA post-grant proceeding in view of the Fintiv factors.  The memorandum is in part a result of...
Christmas Vacate-tion—Petitioners Allowed to Raise Fair Extensions of Petition Arguments

Christmas Vacate-tion—Petitioners Allowed to Raise Fair Extensions of Petition Arguments

by David Maiorana | May 6, 2022 | Federal Circuit Appeal

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – Willis Electric Co., Ltd. (“Willis Electric”) owns U.S. Patent No. 10,222,037 (the “’037 Patent”), titled “Decorative lighting with reinforced wiring.”  The ’037 Patent claims a decorative lighting design involving a strand of...
Fintiv Revisited—District Court Transfer Results in Institution Reversal

Fintiv Revisited—District Court Transfer Results in Institution Reversal

by David Maiorana | Feb 15, 2022 | Request for Reconsideration, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – In November 2020, Google LLC filed two petitions requesting an inter partes review of the claims of Ikorongo Technology LLC (“Ikorongo”) owned U.S. Patent No. 8,874,554 (“the ’554 patent”).  Separate petitions were filed to...
Motion to Exclude Improper Vehicle For Addressing Non-Responsive Evidence

Motion to Exclude Improper Vehicle For Addressing Non-Responsive Evidence

by David Maiorana | Sep 23, 2021 | Evidentiary Issues, Motions Practice

By Lisa Furby and Dave Maiorana – In Apple, Inc. v. Parus Holdings, Inc. (IPR2020-00686), the PTAB denied the Patent Owner’s motion to exclude portions of the Petitioner’s supplemental expert declaration.  Here the Patent Owner sought to exclude a number of...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.