PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Board Terminates Motion to Amend, Citing Inefficient Use of Resources

Board Terminates Motion to Amend, Citing Inefficient Use of Resources

by Albert Liou | Oct 17, 2018 | Amendment Practice

By Albert Liou The Board recently exercised its discretion to terminate trial and obviate the Patent Owner’s pending Motion to Amend, after the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that all of the challenged claims were invalid for lack of patentable...
PTAB Allows Patent Owner to Stay its Own Reissue Proceeding

PTAB Allows Patent Owner to Stay its Own Reissue Proceeding

by Albert Liou | Jul 24, 2018 | Stay

By: H. Albert Liou  PTAB Allows Patent Owner to Stay its Own Reissue Proceeding 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. 42.122(a) vest the PTAB with the power to stay, transfer, consolidate, or terminate any matter pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office while an...
Federal Circuit: PTAB Affirmance Estops All Pending Actions Involving Patent

Federal Circuit: PTAB Affirmance Estops All Pending Actions Involving Patent

by Albert Liou | May 30, 2018 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit

By: Albert Liou In XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C., Nos. 2016-2054, 2016-2136 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2018), an appeal from the District of Colorado, the Federal Circuit gave preclusive effect to a PTAB finding, something it has done several times in the recent past. ...
Anticipation by Combining Elements from the Four Corners of a Reference

Anticipation by Combining Elements from the Four Corners of a Reference

by Albert Liou | Apr 2, 2018 | Prior Art Issues, Uncategorized

By: Albert Liou four corners In a January 12 article, Anticipation Requires More Than A Reference That Discloses All The Elements, we discussed the Microsoft Corp v. Biscotti, Inc. case, where the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the PTAB finding that combining...
Not So Common Sense? Reliance on Common Sense to Establish Obviousness

Not So Common Sense? Reliance on Common Sense to Establish Obviousness

by Albert Liou | Feb 13, 2018 | Evidentiary Issues

By: Albert Liou In KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007), the Supreme Court stated that “common sense” can be considered in reaching a conclusion that a claimed invention is obvious.   Since then, both litigants and patent examiners have often...
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.