PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Rosen Set Table For Design Patent Obviousness, LKQ Might Clear It

Rosen Set Table For Design Patent Obviousness, LKQ Might Clear It

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jan 12, 2023 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit Appeal

By John Evans and Josh Gold-Quiros – Big changes to design patent invalidity law may be coming.  A pending IPR appeal challenges the Federal Circuit’s 40-year-old obviousness formula as inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s rejection of “a rigid rule that limits...
Two’s a Crowd: Prior Art in Design Patent Claim Construction

Two’s a Crowd: Prior Art in Design Patent Claim Construction

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Apr 29, 2021 | Design Patents, PTAB News

By John Evans and Hannah Mehrle – On April 15, 2021, the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision in the LKQ Corp. case finding a design patent claiming a vehicle fender panel unpatentable as obvious.  IPR2020-00064, Paper No. 39 (Apr. 15, 2021).  The obviousness...
Balance is Key in Design Patent Claim Drafting

Balance is Key in Design Patent Claim Drafting

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 10, 2020 | Claim Construction, Design Patents

By Clarissa Sullivan and John Evans The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently designated as informative its decision instituting post-grant review and addressing the issues of design patent functionality in Sattler Tech Corp. v. Humancentric Ventures, LLC.  No....
Opening a Can of Worms for Design Patent Obviousness?

Opening a Can of Worms for Design Patent Obviousness?

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Oct 4, 2019 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit Appeal

By Kerry Barrett and John Evans Design patent obviousness requires a heavy threshold burden of proof.  Challengers have to find a “primary reference,” i.e., prior art that has “basically the same” design characteristics as the claimed design.  Below is an example of...
Design Patents at PTAB – Substantially the Same vs Basically the Same

Design Patents at PTAB – Substantially the Same vs Basically the Same

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Jul 30, 2019 | PGR

By John Evans and Kerry Barrett The PTAB’s recent decision instituting post-grant review of a design patent in Man Wah Holdings Ltd. v. Raffel provides interesting perspectives on how design patent invalidity theories work.  This decision highlights the subtle...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.