Federal Agencies Not Eligible To Challenge Patents In PTAB Trials
Gregory A. Castanias and Jihong Lou On June 10, in a 6-3 decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, the Supreme Court ruled that a federal agency is not a “person” eligible to request post-issuance review of a patent under the Leahy-Smith America...
Court Blocks Stay Request Absent Agreement to Estoppel for Third-Party IPRs
By Jen Bachorik and Matt Johnson The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently denied Defendant Adobe Systems Inc.’s motion to stay litigation pending resolution of parallel inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings before the PTAB...
Federal Agencies May Not Challenge Patents in AIA Post-Issuance Proceedings
By Greg Castanias, Dave Cochran, Jennifer Swize, and Jihong Lou The Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail that a federal agency is not a "person" who may challenge an issued patent in inter partes review, post-grant review, or CBM review under the AIA. In its 6–3...
PTAB Rejects “Real Party in Interest” Challenge to Apple’s Inter Partes Review Petition
By Emily Tait - The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently issued a Final Written Decision in Apple Inc. v. Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A., Case IPR2018-00282 (June 4, 2019) (Paper 30), rejecting Uniloc’s argument that Unified Patents (“Unified”) is a real party in...
No Basis For Broad Exclusion Of Inventor Testimony
By Kenny Luchesi The Board has broad discretion to determine how much weight should be given to inventor testimony, but as long as the testimony does not relate to the inventor’s opinion about the meaning of a claim term, there is no basis for broadly excluding all...