ARTHREX UPDATE: In a Sea of Remands, PTAB Tosses Itself a Lifeline
By Pablo Hendler - On May 1, 2020, the PTAB's Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott R. Boalick issued a General Order holding in administrative abeyance more than 100 matters and “any other matters remanded by the Federal Circuit under Arthrex.” As was previously...
Fed. Cir.: Threat of Suit Over Past Infringement Confers Standing
By Albert Liou - The Federal Circuit’s April 30, 2020 decision in Grit Energy Solutions, LLC v. Oren Technologies, LLC, No. 2019-1063, held that a former patent infringement defendant who had sold off the allegedly infringing product line and obtained a dismissal of...
Lights Out For Solar Cell Follow-On Petition
By Dave Cochran and Robby Breetz - The PTAB denied institution of a follow on petition filed five months after an initial petition by the same petitioner, even though the two petitions were directed to different claims.[1] The Board found no persuasive explanation...
Junior Lawyers Can Receive Additional Argument Time
By Jasper L. Tran, Cameron Baker, and Matt Johnson - As fewer cases go to trial nowadays, judges have long been mindful of providing young lawyers with “stand-up” opportunities. For example, Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California, in his Standing...
PTAB Declines to Institute Multiple IPRs Against the Same Patent
By Levent Herguner and Matt Johnson - The PTAB recently issued two simultaneous decisions in which it granted one IPR petition, but denied another. Both petitions were directed to Patent Owner Tela Innovations, Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 7,943,966 (“the ’966 patent”). ...